| Damming Magdalena: Emgesa Threatens Colombian Communities |
|
|
|
| Written by Jonathan Luna | ||||
| Wednesday, 22 July 2009 13:17 | ||||
![]() Photo by Jonathon Luna A small path descends from the town of La Jagua, crossing a field and forest until it ends at a cliff overlooking the Magdalena River. Pairs of buff-necked ibis take flight announcing their local name, "cocli cocli." Above the beach where children swim, the rock is carved by erosion and dotted with small holes occupied by birds. The landscape is dotted, too, every 100 meters, with concrete markers declaring the land, river, and everything else a "public utility" that Colombia has given to the energy company Emgesa as part of the Quimbo Hydroelectric Project. Quimbo's developer, Bogotá-based Emgesa S.A. Empresa Generadora de Energía, projects costs at $700 million for the hydro component and $200 million for substations. The Ministry of Environment granted a construction permit in May, and the dam is scheduled for full operation by 2014. "If completed, it would be the first of multiple Emgesa dams proposed for the river in the department of Huila, along the country's longest and most economically important river," said Miller Dussán, a leader of the grassroots coalition Plataforma Sur de Organizaciones Sociales and professor of philosophy at the Universidad Sur Colombiana (USCO). The Quimbo dam would inundate about 8,800 hectares (ha) (34 square miles), displace some 1,500 rural peasants and eight community-owned cottage industries, and flood 842 ha of riparian forests and 2,000 ha of cultivated land, warned Dussán. It would severely cut "Agrado's agricultural potential, resulting in its gross domestic product decreasing by at least 30 percent." Discussion
has been heated on radio and in the Colombian legislature which, in
November 2008, held a televised nine-hour debate. Endangered Huila
communities have mounted opposition marches, camps, and local and
regional social forums. Plataforma Sur is spearheading the effort,
which includes regional youth, USCO academics, the Regional Council of
Indigenous Peoples of Huila, Colombia's largest labor union (CUT),
various social and environmental NGOs, autonomous collectives, and
politicians including a former governor of Huila. The campaign is part
of REDLAR, the Latin American Network against Dams.
Also
in November, Radio Garzón invited Emgesa director Lucio Rubio Díaz to
respond callers' questions about the Quimbo project. Marta Ramirez, a
lifelong inhabitant and community leader of la Escalereta, was one of
the few to get through the jammed phone lines. "How is it that these
people [Emgesa], who are not even from here, come to our homes and do
not even ask us what we want or how we feel about this project?"
demanded Ramirez. "They just come here to inform us that our land is no
longer ours, and that we better sell our land at an undervalued price,
or we will be drowned with it and receive nothing. Do you have no soul?
No heart? Do you know you are tearing us from the only thing we have
ever had, our land?" Emgesa: Generating Discontent Throughout
the approval process activists have charged a too cozy relationship
between Bogotá and Emgesa. In late 2007, in violation of constitutional
Article 6, Law 56/81, the Colombian government allowed Emgesa to
perform its own environmental impact study for the Quimbo. Nearly a
year later, without consulting local or regional governments, and
without significant changes to the rejected 1997 plan, President Alvaro
Uribe signed into law Resolution #321, granting Emgesa "all the land
necessary to construct the Hydroelectric Quimbo project." During a
televised community consultation in La Plata in October, Díaz refused
Uribe's request to consider making Huila Department a shareholder.
Uribe later asked Díaz if his company would help train locals for
projects such as tourism and aquaculture that the dam could generate.
"These projects were a possibility," Díaz responded, but "the company
was not responsible for that." Many in the affected
communities were not reassured. In December local youth embarked on the
"First Territorial Running Against the Quimbo," a two-day, 55-kilometer
hike through the proposed reservoir to highlight impacts on the
community. "Weeks ago they said in congress that homeowners who live
where the reservoir is [planned] would get up to 10 ha of land in a
newly irrigated district," said Ms. Clara, a San José de Belén resident
who refilled water gourds for the hikers. "A week later the newspaper
says it will be up to 5 ha, and now, that only those with deeds will
get that deal. Most of us have been here since our grandparents, and
have no deeds." Asked about the militarization, Montero
replied that Emgesa "respected the government's actions," and was not
the proper entity to respond to the government's decision to construct
a battalion near the end of the reservoir.
While the terms are a substantial victory for the dam's opposition, the Ministry document failed to deal with previous fines against the company or the project's fundamental violation of Law 2 of 1959 which designates 95 percent of the dam's region as part of a Protective Amazonian Forest Reserve. Those omissions fueled charges that either the company, the state, or both had bought off the Autonomous Environmental Corporation of the Upper Magdalena River Valley that is now on board with the project. On June 5, International Environment Day, two dozen youth occupied and halted a meeting of the Departmental Gathering of NGOs and Community Environmental Promoters that convened in Neiva to showcase government-sponsored environmental projects in the region. The vice-minister of the Environment, the director of Autonomous Environmental Corporation, and hundreds of people watched as protesters performed an interpretive dance and read a declaration against the dam. Three days later, Plataforma Sur issued a resolution denouncing the project's assaults against the region's biodiversity, communities and existing legislation, and demanded that the license be revoked. On June 23, a paramilitary group identified as the Nueva Generación de Águilas Negras circulated pamphlets on Neiva's USCO campus targeting 14 members of Plataforma Sur. It identified students, alumni and faculty as "military objectives." Despite the threat, activists are planning an international camp against the dam in November. The Quimbo Huilense Bogotá and Emgesa promote the dam as "necessary" to an area long forgotten by the state: It will, they say, create jobs and development opportunities in aquaculture, tourism, irrigation and construction. An alternative plan, el Quimbo Huilense—designed and backed by communities, academics, educators, and other Huilense people—counters that the best path for sustainable development is a widely integrated, multi-faceted rural development project. This regional scheme would create opportunities for local inhabitants to establish small-scale agricultural cooperative industries, and create protected habitats, irrigation districts and more agricultural land. Quimbo Huilense addresses energy needs with a smaller hydroelectric dam at the Quimbo site that would inundate 3,600 ha, affecting only the municipality of Gigante. A local utilities company would run the project, and provide irrigation for 148,262 hectares. In its reliance on community input to create a self-reliant local economy with sustainable environmental practices, Quimbo Huilense stands in direct contrast to the government and Emgesa's plans for the region. "What Plataforma Sur is suggesting for us is a first,"
said Marta Ramirez as she surveyed a flock of birds feeding in her
yard. "They are consulting us as residents about the possible future of
our territory and our lives."
|







