Source: Honduras Culture and Politics
Wednesday afternoon, the Honduran Supreme Court’s Constitutional branch, consisting of 5 justices, reported that they had reached a unanimous decision invalidating part of Article 239 of the Honduran constitution. Such a decision would effectively permit Presidential re-election. This morning at 8:34 am, Justice Lizardo of that branch rescinded his signature and vote of approval for the decision. That should make the ruling invalid, and because the decision is no longer unanimous, throw the case to the full 15 Justices for a decision.
The decision, announced Wednesday and scheduled to be released Thursday, was in a court case brought by former president Rafael Callejas and several National Party Congressmen, who sought to invalidate part of Article 239 of the Honduran constitution. Longtime readers will remember that Article 239 was used, after the fact, to justify the coup against President Manuel Zelaya Rosales in 2009. Roberto Micheletti Bain claimed that the Cuarta Urna vote was to enable Zelaya Rosales to run again for President.
Thursday morning, in a letter addressed to the Secretary of the Constitutional branch of the Supreme Court, Carlos Almedaren, Justice José Elmer Lizardo Carranza rescinded his vote of approval:
“By this letter I make known to you that I rescind my signature on the accumulated case 1343-2014 and 243-2015….Because there’s been no official notification of the plaintiff’s lawyers by the secretary at this hour, 8:40 AM, this makes the decision not final.”
So, while it was announced that Presidential re-election was about to be come legal through a Supreme Court decision, the future is a bit more murky now. Stay tuned.