|Bolivia: Sachs Versus the Facts|
|Written by Benjamin Kohl and Linda Farthing|
|Monday, 19 March 2012 12:08|
What follows is a response to the piece published in The Nation’s website by Jeffrey Sachs entitled Why I'm the Right Candidate for World Bank President.
“Who else but me among the widely rumored candidates has a record of standing for the poorest of the poor?" – Jeffrey Sachs
Jeffrey Sachs has nominated himself as the ‘progressive’ candidate in a non-election to head the World Bank, and judging from his campaign materials it’s a good thing they’re looking for an economist and not a historian. Nothing reveals this historical shortsightedness better than a review some of the ‘facts’ on Bolivia in his post on Economic Reforms in Bolivia, Poland in the 80s and 90s, A Look at the Data.
Among the ‘facts’ that Sachs includes is a slide that shows the increase in immunization rates following the 1985 neoliberal structural adjustment program (SAP) that he calls ‘stabilization’. One would think that a world-class development economist would understand the difference between correlation and causation. The implication is that the reduction in inflation rates somehow allowed the government to increase health expenditures, yet nothing is further from the truth. Immunizations were not paid for by the state and social investments by the state actually fell during this period.
Sachs also praises the democratically-elected government of Victor Paz Estensorro for declaring a state of siege and sending opponents into internal exile, rather than simply murdering them, making another spurious comparison, this time to Chile. He fails to mention that Chile was in the hands of a brutal, US-sponsored dictatorship after 1973, which, unsurprisingly more violently repressed dissidents than Bolivia’s civilian government. But even more disingenuous, structural adjustment didn’t occur in Chile until years after the most violent repression to eliminate Allende supporters had ended.
What Sachs fails to mention, however, is the clear link between the SAP in Bolivia and the 1980s coca and cocaine boom. Thousands of miners, peasants, and factory workers who lost their livelihoods because of ‘stabilization’ fled to the agricultural frontier to sow coca, the one crop that had a guaranteed market. The government implicitly allowed the laundering of drug money through offering certificates of deposit in US dollars at the central bank, no questions asked. The influx of money from the drug trade, perhaps the best expression of what capitalism can do in an unregulated market, was responsible for a substantial part of the economic growth for which Sachs wishes to claim credit.
We show in Impasse in Bolivia that the neoliberal ‘stabilization’ plan that Sachs is so proud of set the stage for 15 years of slow economic growth and increasing opposition to neoliberalism. Bolivia, promoted by the World Bank and IMF as a neoliberal success story in the 1980s and 1990s, morphed into the poster child of the anti-globalization movement when the people of Cochabamba rose up in the ‘Water War’ of 2000. This set in motion a period of unrest that led to the resignation of two presidents before a leader committed to the interests of the poor majority was elected in 2005.
While Sachs may indeed be the best of possible candidates (a narrow field if limited to US economists) to lead the World Bank, it is worrisome that he chooses to gloss over rather than critically address the complex issues associated with the SAP that helped launch his global career.
Just the Facts:
Benjamin Kohl and Linda Farthing are co-authors of Impasse in Bolivia: Neoliberal Hegemony and Popular Resistance (Zed 2006), and with Felix Muruchi of From the Mines to the Streets: a Bolivian Activist’s Life (U Texas Press 2011).